FOR THE LOVE OF GOD: The Nigerian State and Religion (2)

…now in conclusion,

WEB OF CONFUSION

5120671022_politics_or_religion_xlarge

Religion is such a controversial subject that its meaning and etymology in this modern time and age of electronic encyclopedias and lightning-fast word searches, is still in contention. “The etymology of ‘religion’ is indeed disputed. This is not, of course, the case when it comes to English, which clearly inherited the word from Latin religio. Rather it applies to Latin itself, in which it is not clear what the component parts of the noun religio are or mean” (The Jewish Daily Forward, 2007). Dr. Nonyerem Davidson of the Openmind Foundation (UK/Nigeria) however attempted a definition from a collaboration of the myriad of definitions available for the word ‘religion’. And I find his definition satisfactory:

“A strongly held organized system of belief about a superior, sacred, divine and unseen being (God); and obedience to the superior, sacred, divine and unseen God through abiding by uncompromising moral codes, practices, values, traditions and rituals associated with the belief system”.

Going by this, one realizes that religion is such a multi-limbed subject that confusion is not only very possible but apparently aided. This proves, I daresay, that Christianity, for instance, is not one unique religion but an umbrella for different religions; yes, the different churches and ideologies many term as ‘denominations’ could very well be religions of their own because “…practices, values, traditions and rituals…” differ among them. In the same vein, it is quite possible – and this is only a postulation – that some of the different beliefs and practices of the Shia Islam set them apart as a different religion from the Sunni Islam. It is frightening to imagine what other declassifications could arise under the traditional religion considering the plethora of deities worshipped in the over 700 ethnic groups of Nigeria.

Religion is undoubtedly, a humongous institution by itself, a thick web which stretches wider and stronger with time. The same goes for government, some parts of whose complexity are still mysterious with miles of dizzying labyrinths. Why then…HOW then would any society with a healthy sense of self-preservation venture to fuse both entities?

 

RESOLVED

Chuba Okadigbo while arguing against mixing religion and governance once said, “Religion being a matter of individual choice and faith, must be left where it is, such that our clerics can take care of our souls and religious persuasions, while elected civilians take care of the businesses of governance”. But Jeanne Shaheen believes that “Religion and morality are critical to how students think about politics and form opinions on political issues”.

Some people would have that mixing religion and government be likened to mixing water and oil – the liquids never mix and make a sloppy mess, while others recommend that the state cannot exist without active religious involvement. However differing our stances are on this issue, there are a couple of things which I believe we all can agree on. First is the fact that religion cannot be totally separated from politics and governance in Nigeria. We are a sentimental people who preach and defend relentlessly our beliefs or lack thereof in a supreme being; and as a mark of principle and self-righteous morality, we generally prefer to ‘leave everything to God’. It is justifiably hard to imagine a Nigeria without a spiritual presence. The second very agreeable point is that this fixation of ours with the blind practice of religion has done us much more harm than good. Nigerians vote based on religious preferences (refer to Anambra state gubernatorial elections 2013); fight and kill each other due to (concocted or genuine) religious convictions (refer to Boko Haram, now a globally recognized terrorist organization); and make laws along the lines of religious precepts and values (refer to the Anti-gay law passed in January, 2014).

A leader is first and foremost, a man, many will argue, and he is therefore justified to make state decisions guided by his religious principles. But I disagree; a man upon taking up the mantle of leadership of fellow men physically remains a man but psychologically transforms into MEN. This is not about whether or not a president of Muslim heritage will take off his headgear or stand or clap along with the congregation when in a Christian assembly. The issue doesn’t concern itself with a governor who takes out of his personal funds and donates to renovate the local parish in his hometown. Neither does it bother about whether or not the president says a catholic prayer before commencing his GEC meetings. All of these are within the leader’s right to a freedom of choice.

But that right stops at exactly the same point where the rights of his followers to their own choices of religion begin. Where matters of state are concerned, where decisions which will affect the entire people – godly and godless – of a nation are concerned and especially where religion clashes with the law and its duty to protect its charges, the leader should have the mental consciousness to separate his person into two selves – the ‘man of a religion’ self and the ‘man of the people’ self. At such times, he must draw a line between the state and religion and for the love of God, he had better straddle it firmly.

 “For only a godly man can rule a state best, a godly man who knows the godless”

  download

 

 

Advertisements

14 thoughts on “FOR THE LOVE OF GOD: The Nigerian State and Religion (2)

  1. Every human act is influenced by a belief, and the ideals on which beliefs take root form the precepts of Religion. I dare say that it is and will always be impossible to separate Religion from the affairs of State, in as much as laws are to be made and obeyed. Are laws not made based on what lawmakers ‘believe’ to be in the interest of the common good? If you say “don’t kill” but “you can choose to abort”, have you not made a judgement based on ‘Faith’ in something? What we should strive for is that The Truth should, at all times and in all places, be upheld… And if this Truth (which, of course, IS NOT RELATIVE!) is thought by any certain Religion, it must be of student of Wisdom and in the inevitable interest of “common good” that all submit to it “in meekness and humility of heart”

    “Lord, teach us…”

    • I agree with you, Lex. As I said, it is near-impossible to erect a brickwall between the two especially in the Nigerian society. But a clear line of distinction is imperative so that all these evil men hiding behind the façades of belief amd religion will be stripped for.us all to see.

  2. I must commend the choice of words used. They are quite captivating! Indeed, it is only a godly man who knows the godless than can rule a state best.

    • Kai, Tobe…u nah come and be making me shy.lol. Thanks, bro. Yes indeed…I’m waiting for the Guiness people to call me about including it in their Book of Quotes by Great Men. 😉

  3. Love the fact that the freedom to personal choices of a leader is spelt out well. Also applaud the fact that there is a limit to the leader’s right over the people’s right. A leader elected to rule a nation like nigeria-with over 200 ethnic groups (having different beliefs and probably worshipping different dieties, not to mention other religions aside from christainity) should be unbias in his dealings concerncing the state. Also bearing in mind, to keep law and order. Nice work. #thumbs up#

    • Wow, thanks Jessy. I really hoped this concluding part would unequivocally state my stand. I’m glad you think u did AND u agree. woudn’t want you as an opponent on this strong one…lol

  4. In as much as the MAN (and his principles) is formed mostly from religious beliefs, the ruler/leader, who was voted for for probably as a result of principles he holds dear, cannot be expected to be totally unbiased in decision making . Believe it or not many principles are common to all or most of the religions we practise (take the anti-gay stance for instance) and as such governing a people according to these common principles will actually mean doing the bidding of the majoriity which is the essence of a DEMOCRacy…that we claim to practise

    • I hear you and I agree that a leader shouldn’t be expected to make decisions completely separate from his ideologies most of which are probably nurtured by religion. But it takes a great leader, a MAN among men to know that he represents the law and the truth, not his principles.
      Also I seriously disagree about democracy being essentially about a majority. Democracy picks a leader by the vote of a majority but for it to remain a government of the people, for the people and by the people, it must be essentially about the truth, law and peace. which sometimes, like in the case of the anti-gay law, is not the mind of the majority.

      • What then is the law and the truth which you point towards? An opinion held by a philosopher? Or the agreement reached by a great majority of the society in which we live (in as much as it is not amoral). I daresay that in a democracy, not only are leaders picked by a majority vote, but laws are also made and enforced as per the view of the majority…that’s what makes it a democracy and gives it the semblance of the ‘people’ ruling and not the leader. The leader in the minds of the people is one who is consistent in upholding these agreed laws. For now, the anti-gay law speaks the mind of the majority, and while that may yet change in the future, I implore you to ask your parents just to confirm…Lol

  5. lol…you know my parent too well, nwoke m. I agree that laws are made and enforced as per the view of the majority but should it be so? The goddess of justice, Thermes is blindfolded for a reason; and the scale she holds is not a scale of quantities but of truth. Truth is that which everyone knows but most refuse to accept especially when it is bitter. And the law is that stand which oppresses no innocent member of the society and strives to make that same society comfortable for ALL…majority AND minority.
    Guy, u don dey carry this argument enter anti-gay law again. Perhaps I should post my article on the anti-gay law here…

Share your thoughts...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s